Inside Murder Trial

<p>It’s the final episode of this series of Inside Murder Trial – everything could hinge on the closing speeches of the advocates. Can either side present a compelling argument which proves Campbell’s guilt, or provide enough doubt for the jury to find him not guilty?</p><p>Tommy Ross KC explains the methods behind the speeches, and the options available to the jury. </p><p>This time - for the first time on Inside Murder Trial - the jury have only two options - finding David Campbell either inno

<p>After nearly two weeks hearing the prosecution case, the jury are now set to hear just a handful of witnesses for the defence. </p><p>Tommy Ross KC explains the defence don’t need to prove Campbell’s innocence - just raise doubts and point out reasons why the jury might find him innocent. </p><p>Central to the defence case - David Campbell takes the decision to give evidence - and opens himself to cross examination.</p>

<p>The final witnesses for the prosecution are called to give evidence, but what impact will they have on proceedings? </p><p>The jury is played extracts from David Campbell’s police interview - where he chooses to answer some questions and not others. And Tommy reflects on Campbell’s decision to go ahead without any legal representation. </p><p>Later in court, there is drama as the jury is reduced to 14 members. What impact could this have on the final verdict?</p>

<p>The partner of the accused is rarely called by the prosecution. But today – we hear evidence from David’s wife of more than 57 years. She’s asked about his relationship with the victim, Brian Low. </p><p>And she’s quizzed about the CCTV showing a bike similar to hers being ridden through Aberfeldy. Does she agree that the rider could be her husband?</p><p>Later in the episode we learn how David’s football allegiance could raise questions about the blue bag apparently being carried by the kill

<p>After yesterday’s revelations from the CCTV cameras, we follow more images which perhaps show someone on their way to commit the murder. But do any of the camera’s provide a clear shot of who that person is?</p><p>We also see footage of David Campbell apparently making gestures towards the police – on his own camera system. </p><p>Later – there is evidence which might explain why David’s wife’s bike has changed its appearance. And clues which could explain where David was hiding a gun. Or – t

<p>It’s an emotional day in court as Brian’s loved ones recall the moment their world was shattered, as they first learned that Brian was dead. And then – that he had been murdered. Later, we hear evidence from a police officer who gathered CCTV in the case. And we build a picture of what COULD be the killer on his way to commit the murder…only there’s no images which show his face. Then, on another camera, we witness some bizarre behaviour from the accused. Could his own home camera system pr

<p>The discovery of a body is always a dramatic moment in court. This episode hears from the first on the scene – from neighbours, to paramedics, and police, as Brian Low is found deceased, with his labrador Millie loyally by his side. </p><p>We’ll hear how Brian’s death was initially thought not to be suspicious – perhaps stemming from a medical episode rather than foul play. And we’ll hear evidence around how long he may have been in the lane before he was found. </p><p>As the day continues –

<p>Having already heard about David Campbell’s temper, todays episode moves on to the relationship between him and the victim, Brian Low. The court hears that they were colleagues, who didn’t always see eye-to-eye. </p><p>And we hear evidence about an incident, more than a decade earlier, which might have cemented ill feeling between them. </p><p>Later in court – attention turns to an incident in 2023, just three months before the murder. A man is seen riding a bike, close to the location where